| |
- notice of
performance deficiencies with an
explanation of why, unless it is obvious,
that something is a deficiency (i.e.,
notice element);
2) notice that the deficiencies may or will
result in a lower performance rating (i.e.,
impact element); and,
3) an explanation of what must be done to bring
performance back up to its previous level (i.e.,
improvement element.)"
In this case the arbitrator found that although
the manager gave notice of the deficiencies, he
did not provide sufficient notice that linked the
deficiencies to a lower evaluation and did not
provide any explanation of how to improve
performance. Even though the supervisor
provided an e-mail nine months into the appraisal
cycle that the employee could expect a lower
evaluation, he effectively shifted the burden of
providing advice from him to the grievant by
telling her to come to him with "questions
or concerns." The arbitrator ordered the
grievant's evaluation raised to her previous
rating of "Excellent."
With any victory there is a cost. This case is
no exception. This arbitration was heard by the
arbitrator at a cost of over seventeen thousand
dollars ($17,000). Payment if these expenses
are divided between IRS, Nation NTEU and our
local chapter as follows:
IRS $8,777.20
National NTEU $4,388.60
NTEU Chapter 46 $4,388.60
Our NTEU attorney did a great job on this one.
Her good work was backed up, of course, by the
outstanding work of the stewards and officers of
chapter 46.
|
|